User blog comment:DragonBossGala/Ive been removed from my position/@comment-6975131-20140225140949

Here is the entire conversation from last night, nothing taken out of context.[2/24/2014 10:07:32 PM] Alice S: Sup? [2/24/2014 10:08:10 PM] Prince Oberyn: Hello :O [2/24/2014 10:08:10 PM] Jeremie Gatchalian: Gonna brb for some chores.. [2/24/2014 10:08:41 PM] Alice S: So. Why's Pending so full? Why's it been so full for the last few weeks? [2/24/2014 10:09:01 PM] Prince Oberyn: We actually cleared it out last week, it just re filled [2/24/2014 10:09:46 PM] Tony (Raga): Regrettably, what with Tsu and Trent apparently busy, and Arren lacking a computer, none of them have been able to actually do reviewing; thus, Raga's kinda been the only one doing it recently, and it appears to have filled back up [2/24/2014 10:10:22 PM] Alice S: Actually. Shitty question. Because I don't really want excuses. Why is it not checked and cleared spotless every day, and then watched semi-frequently whenever a Review-Capable Admin is online?

Why is the level of quality in reviews completely nosedived. I've checked most of them, they're not exactly staying true to the Reform rules. [2/24/2014 10:10:45 PM] Tony (Raga): Such as...? [2/24/2014 10:13:34 PM] Alice S: Such as sevral infractions against established rulings that were agreed upon. There's been a few infractions on the Naming Convention, which we all agreed to begin to enforce. At least one infraction against the established weapon rulings meant to help combat characters that would bring entire arsenals to a fight. [2/24/2014 10:14:09 PM] Tony (Raga): In the incident of which we have a clause dedicated to the altering of reviews, yes. [2/24/2014 10:14:36 PM] Alice S: Not to mention Rejection reviews don't have the typical detail I've seen from older ones, your OWN older ones. Rejection is meant to help people fix issues, not just point them out. [2/24/2014 10:15:39 PM] Alice S: Nono, stop, I'm not going to go and tell you every time you fuss up a Review. That's not my job. That's meant to happen between two Reviewers/Admins, who should be expected to assist in proof-reading one another. [2/24/2014 10:16:23 PM] Tony (Raga): As I've mentioned, the other administrators are either busy to the point of being unable to review unless one is specifically brought up to them, or have a broken computer. [2/24/2014 10:17:09 PM] Alice S: And incase you're under the impression I'm still an Admin. I'm not. I left because of the way some of my peers acted towards me, took some of my actions, and some of the words they've said that flat out insulted me. [2/24/2014 10:17:28 PM] Alice S: And I don't plan on returning so long as the offenders will be my peers once more. [2/24/2014 10:17:38 PM] Tony (Raga): I take issue with the fact that you evidently believe that our respect is deserved whilst we deserve none of our own. [2/24/2014 10:17:54 PM] *** Jeremie Gatchalian removed snoop dogg from this conversation. *** [2/24/2014 10:18:32 PM] Tony (Raga): Also, I apologize for us evidently poorly displaying our work environment; we don't really do very many thank-you's. Like when I drafted the original ruleset and got it okayed, there were no thanks, because it was a casual work environment and we were all working together towards the goal. [2/24/2014 10:18:36 PM] Prince Oberyn: Ok. BAsically, you wont come back unless I or whoever leaves? Is that he bottom line? [2/24/2014 10:18:56 PM] Prince Oberyn: Cus this discussing stuff, just shoots up my blood pressure [2/24/2014 10:19:19 PM] Alice S: Yes, I'm aware you've got an issue with me. But I've said, sevral times, in our private discussions you probably don't share in chatlogs since they don't make me out to look like an ass, I have made efforts to correct the preceived offences, and have complimented and commented on your good efforts, not just to you all, but to people who wonder what the hell you do when they saw me working hard on Reviews and stuff the Community sees, not the stuff they Don't that you guys worked on. [2/24/2014 10:19:38 PM] Tony (Raga): Arren takes issue with that you goaded him out of his comfort zone to the point where he gave you what your actions showed him you wanted, you got angry at him. [2/24/2014 10:20:35 PM] Alice S: Again. Excuses. Accusations. I don't care. This is why I left. Everything and anything ends up back to me and my fault and you two are dauntless angels with nary a flaw. [2/24/2014 10:20:38 PM] Tony (Raga): I've been active on the fanon every day I've been capable, Tsu was so busy that he wasn't even able to come offline in a week, and Arren has the issue with being flat-out incapable of coming olnine. [2/24/2014 10:20:50 PM] Tony (Raga): Again, this condescending attitude of yours. [2/24/2014 10:20:57 PM] Tony (Raga): What was it I did when I deleted that comment? [2/24/2014 10:20:58 PM] Tony (Raga): Ah; yes. [2/24/2014 10:21:00 PM] Tony (Raga): Apologized. [2/24/2014 10:21:08 PM] Tony (Raga): Profusely and repeatedly, admitting that I made a mistake. [2/24/2014 10:21:15 PM] Prince Oberyn: Hm [2/24/2014 10:21:18 PM] Alice S: Never saw it. [2/24/2014 10:21:19 PM] Tony (Raga): Something that, as you can clearly see, I do a lot. [2/24/2014 10:21:21 PM] Tony (Raga): ... [2/24/2014 10:21:22 PM] Tony (Raga): You did,. [2/24/2014 10:21:26 PM] Tony (Raga): You replied to it. [2/24/2014 10:21:31 PM] Tony (Raga): during that whole conversation [2/24/2014 10:21:32 PM | Edited 10:21:39 PM] Prince Oberyn: The biased Chatlog debate is null just saying [2/24/2014 10:21:35 PM] Alice S: Where is this, exactly? [2/24/2014 10:21:35 PM] Tony (Raga): I said it multiple times! [2/24/2014 10:21:39 PM] Tony (Raga): In the chat! [2/24/2014 10:21:42 PM] Tony (Raga): Like a month ago! [2/24/2014 10:21:45 PM] Alice S: Refresh my memory. [2/24/2014 10:22:07 PM] Tony (Raga): Of what? [2/24/2014 10:22:30 PM] Tony (Raga): I deleted your comment, as that OC was already out of pending. You took it as a lack of respect/affront, to which I apologized. [2/24/2014 10:22:37 PM] Tony (Raga): Does this sound familiar? [2/24/2014 10:22:40 PM] Alice S: Oh. That. [2/24/2014 10:22:43 PM] Tony (Raga): ... [2/24/2014 10:22:43 PM] Tony (Raga): ._. [2/24/2014 10:22:46 PM] Alice S: Old ass already solved news. [2/24/2014 10:23:10 PM] Alice S: I thought you meant something more recent. [2/24/2014 10:23:21 PM] Alice S: And regardless, even though you apologized to that. [2/24/2014 10:23:42 PM] Alice S: You, Arren and Trent all refused to let it lie, and brought up my behavior during it as a big ass problem for a good few weeks after it was *resolved* [2/24/2014 10:23:58 PM] Alice S: While nobody, not a soul, not even MYSELF, brought up the other end of it. [2/24/2014 10:24:03 PM] Alice S: To which you admitted existed. [2/24/2014 10:24:12 PM] Tony (Raga): The end of Raga making mistakes? [2/24/2014 10:24:48 PM] Alice S: Which again, is just more proof that whenever something went wrong when I was an Admin, or whenever I was trying to get something done and had to resort to a little poking and prodding to get quiet people in POWER to finally take responsibility? [2/24/2014 10:24:55 PM] Alice S: It all ended up being my fault and my fault alone. [2/24/2014 10:25:14 PM] Tony (Raga): How so? [2/24/2014 10:25:25 PM] Alice S: Nobody EVER admitted their lack of talking, or trying, or bringing issues up was ever a problem. Infact, you guys said that it was FINE like that, because there was never a problem before me. [2/24/2014 10:25:36 PM] Tony (Raga): Sel. [2/24/2014 10:25:41 PM] Alice S: And that my presence and my actions and every single thing I ever did was a problem because it was different. [2/24/2014 10:25:41 PM] Tony (Raga): We are different people. [2/24/2014 10:25:47 PM] Tony (Raga): Different stuff works for different people. [2/24/2014 10:25:58 PM] Tony (Raga): I am neither an assertive nor a confrontational person. [2/24/2014 10:26:07 PM] Tony (Raga): Hell, I get panic attacks when I try. [2/24/2014 10:26:09 PM] Tony (Raga): Also. [2/24/2014 10:26:14 PM] Prince Oberyn: Raga, stop raising your bl...