Talk:Austin Argento/@comment-24678303-20150804041234/@comment-26441997-20150804082223

If one can't have multiple of the same weapon, then why does it clearly state "two+ of the same weapon" on the base guidelines page? (http://gyazo.com/fca5c8dec05b09f8d3541651ea2a84a2) I only make such a big deal about it because no other moderators that I have previously discussed this character with in the past months have ever given me a problem with it. They're four knives, almost exactly identical with the exception of the curves of the blades, they have an allocation on each for dust, and there's a personal preference for which blade has which dust. If you're going to tell me again that it's against the rules, please, do us both a favor and explain to me why they are not counted as the same.

For semblance, no multi-function? Alright, fine with me, I'll cut the buff aspect then. Control isn't a great word, I'm not gonna be using that any more I suppose. I should be using the word "affect" instead. Control implies that the target has no control of their own in concern for their actions, this is not the case. As mentioned in the trivia and I believe in the last comment, it's a principle of resonant frequencies, it causes vibrations that directly affect the movements of a living being in order to give the percieved effect of someone moving by another active force, while the reality of the situation is that their body's various chemical impulses are being confused by the frequencies created through the semblance. The actual function is to throw off movements, cause general confusion, and it's a pretty nifty distraction tool. How's that for you, does that clear up any confusion over actually controlling people?

On the topic of the spartan kick. I didn't realize I'm not allowed to reference pop-culture (specifically, the movie "300", in which Leonidas, the attack's namesake, kicks someone in a similar matter) in order to make something a bit more relatable, I'll take out that portion and leave the more physical description I added if it's such a big concern.

Finally, how else do you want me to reply to the review? I've seen it stated explicitly, many times from many people, that you shouldn't adress these matters on a reviewers page, so I assumed it was only logical to respond with my own thoughts and concerns on my own page. I'm sorry if it was too long of a comment, over time I began to add more things and it got a little bit out of hand. I do apologize, but I felt it necessary to respond to each point given in a well-reasoned manner, and the only way I personally could do that was explaining my thoughts on all matters. However, if you have a problem with the way that I choose to handle this matter, please keep that to my personal page, and not the comments section of my character. Oh, and what exactly do you mean by "appeal for review"? If you're referring to the final note at the bottom of my page, that was simply to avoid any confusion when some things that may have been expected to change were not. I've had experiences in these sorts of mannerisms and frankly it's aggrevating, so I wanted to keep that from happening.