User blog comment:Derrmann/Why multi-function requirement is a bad idea./@comment-24143795-20140127002159/@comment-8182065-20140127031417

Oh I see what you're getting at, basically show ownership of the weapon they use, give it that extra touch to separate it from similar weapons. I'll admit it is something that has to be added for originality, but wouldn't necessarily count as a rule (more of a suggestion really IMO).

And the class part I hadn't thought of it that way. However, if they mainly use and have great skill with a sword, they can be considered a swordsman; if they have magical attributes as well, the term "Magic Swordsman" might come up, but that original title is still there. I don't think that the label would be a bad thing because it is the path they chose; it more depends on what the creator in question does to make them somewhat different.