Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6975131-20140705212431/@comment-24296957-20140705231911

I fully, 117%, support this. This is the first of many steps to correct and ensure this Staff is operational.

Both of these things need to happen. It's my belief that the Staff serve the people. Therefore, the people have the right to bring into question a member of Staff. The way a government should be run.

While absences are a very real occurence, it should be up to the person in question to leave a note behind.

Keeping a check on CMs and Admins ensures them doing their job correctly, scrutinizing what they do. And those who long for a position will know what's in store for them.

To add on the second proposition, perhaps in that event, said Staff member should write a defense - to prevent being judged in a biased maner. Both parties, in that case, would state points, and let the people decide - like how a court functions.

In the event of a demotion/open position, there needs to be strict criteria, qualifications - to ensure the applicant fits the bill.

In the end, this is the turning of a new leaf. And I will always be proud to call this place home.

\m/