Talk:Hǎiyáng Castellan/@comment-24678303-20150305235935/@comment-30168060-20150324212659

I fail to see where the issue is long done, seeing as this is still in the rejected pile. And theres nothing edgy about what were were talking about. Reveiwers are not supposed to make assumptions on what they think the person behind the story is like, they're supposed to reveiw the story and go from there. I've been reveiwing and critiquing fan stories for a few years, and whenever you get personal (I.E > Calling someone lazy because you don't like what they wrote) all you're doing is being a douche. You may be right that it's not ready for publication/being accepted in whatever case the discussion is about, but thats no reason to "suggest" the author is lazy, because they don't have a mindset capable of creating something completely original.