Talk:Talis Ebonmere/@comment-24678303-20160130103438/@comment-27356798-20160201015123

Well...That happened.

First things first, it wasn't my intent to annoy anyone when I posted on her wall, I merely wished to understand the situation of the semblance better, so I could avoid the hassle in the future. This is also the reason why I was discussing it with Leaf. As it is, all I got from the situation was that I can't have anything even remotely resembling other things, despite the fact that others on the Fanon have semblances similar to other sources. This left me rather confused, so I sought advice from staff members. Sorry for the inconvience, Sir. 

Second, Having older versions of mechanics happens in pretty much EVERY mechanical profession, not Just Iron Man. To not have older versions of a complex piece of machinery is ludicrous, to say the least. (On another note, Winter told Weiss flat out that the Paladin Yang wrecked was a prototype. From what I know of Prototypes, they're mostly proof-of-concept models, without much of what makes them powerful. (ie a tank without antipersonnel weaponry).

So what I'm getting from this review is that:

1. Armor isn't a thing in the RWBYverse, and protecting your aura by covering your body isn't a thing, despite the fact that armor not only exists, but is in every aspect of human military (including academies), and that by the "Aura trumps all" logic, clashing weapons would be just as aura-intensive as butting heads. Hunter Vs Hunter battles would literally just be "Who has the most aura" competitions.

In addition hitting a weak spot will drain aura like nothing else (Team SSSN, Scarlet getting taken out by taking coconuts to the coconuts, Yatsuhashi blocking blows with his armored shoulder but cringing when struck elsewhere, etc etc).

2. Anything resembling things from other mediums will be smacked down hard, even if you have no idea what people are talking about when they say "Fallout Armor". Seriously, I had to google that shit. Not only that, I even Put a section into the misc SAYING that I'd based it off of Iron man and the medieval knight (Which Btw, was more than likely an inspiration for Cardin's design). People in this fanon base OCs off of anime characters and other pieces of literature ''All The Bloody Time. ''And guess what? They're accepted.

3. Don't talk back to the almighty overlords of the Fanon. Which...Seems wrong to me, at least from a fan's perspective. I came here to have fun with my OCs, and to meet new people who I could talk to about the show and characters. I've met some people who I'd like to RP with, and for the most part, things have been okay.

I was told that your reviewing style was "Blunt". This was not blunt, it was, with all due respect, razor edged. From the tone you set in your descriptors and sarcastic comments, it almost seemed like you have something against me personally. If that is not the case, then fine, but it is something I believe that you should know.

I haven't played Fallout 4, or watched Iron man 2/3. I haven't had steam cred in a while, and I heard that the iron man 2/3 movies were crap, and avoided them. So...I guess that they're similar? Okay. That seems more like an opinion reason to reject than anything else. On a personal level, that seems wrong to me, but please, tell me otherwise.

And on a final note. Reject my OC if you want, that's your choice, after all. I hold nothing against you or any other reviewer. You keep the wikia running, after all. You volunteer your time, and y'know what? You have to read through a bunch of shitty OCs, among which you probably include mine.

But leaving a pseudo-threatening message behind on the end of a review as a reminder to not talk back? It makes it seem to me that your review was less about reviewing my OC than it was about settling some beef. Kind of misplaced, considering you already gave me that message before. It served no purpose other than to completely shatter any hint of impartiality your review could have held on to.