Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24296957-20140704023647/@comment-24080120-20140706003232

MrxReDnEsSX274 wrote: Vanity Chaos wrote: MrxReDnEsSX274 wrote: DragonBossGala wrote: "Not consulting the community before promotions/demotions is a fault"

I point you to this> We made promotions this way so that it wouldn't devolve into a popularity contest, only people approved and qualified by the admins/mods will be promoted. but still arren, promoting someone, who then shows to be unfit for their possition/lacks the maturity/respect for their position, is indicative that the community should have been questioned about what the thought. I think the gist of it is, you were gone for 3-4 MONTHS, people change in that time, and people you thought were great before, not so much now. I'm pretty sure you're talking about me. If you read what I wrote here, it shows how much I earned my position, it wasn't given, it was earned. Plus, like what Raga said, it wasn't Arren's decision, people got promoted through majority vote of the admins. good job van, you did earn your position, in a time 3-4 months ago, not now. But whathave you done with your position is my question to you. 3-4 months ago? I did all of that NOW, when I got promoted. What have I done with my position? did you even read what I wrote? I helped people.
 * No person should be promoted to ANY Staff member position without Majority Support from Admins/Crats
 * CMs, Reviewers and Admins MUST only be removed with majority support from the Admins/Crats.
 * No Crat (Bureaucrat) can be instated without unanimous agreement from the Administrators
 * No Admin/Crat has the power to veto something already passed via majority.