Thread:Imosa1/@comment-17970636-20140119185525

Good morning Imosa, well, it is morning for me, don't know about you. Sadly... I'm sorry to say that I'm not here for small talk. There is a bit of an issue regarding what you've been doing on the fanon for quite a while now, and I have decided to take the task of informing you about how what you're doing is seen by some, if not the majority, of the fanon. Please continue to read on, and I will say that you have all rights to give your own view on this. However, I request that you do so in a civilized manner, failure to do so, and I will give you a warning. Persist to do so, and I will inform the admins about your behaviour and the fact that you disrespected a staff member. Please do not push me to doing so, as it would be very saddening. However, as I have stated before, if you can reply in a civilized manner with you view, we can have a small debate about it and hopefully meet at a crossroads to how this should be done.

You've been posting reviews on characters for quite a while now, and in the past, it has been shown that people have sometimes disliked what you have done. You made a blog post: http://rwbyfanon.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Imosa1/How_I_review, which describes how you view RWBY OC's and what makes a good OC, IN YOUR OPINION. Now, opinionating is not a bad thing, however, your views can sometimes be seen as intrusive, or radical, depending on the person. I personally, PERSONALLY, I do not speak for the rest of the fanon is this accord, that your views pick out singular things within an OC, and make it look like a candidate for rejection. More often than not, your reviews clash with the reviews done by Selena or I, and in that accord, I cannot allow you to persist. It is not openly saying that you do not agree with us, but there is that subtle undertone, as well as, as  I have stated before, making the OC look like a candidate for rejection and what not.

Also, in your blog, you have quite, for lack of better term, singular and straightforward views on what an OC should be. Anything within an OC that does not fit your guidelines, forgive me for saying so, you make look like it should not be on the fanon. You also, have, in the past, stated quite bluntly and harshly certain aspects of OC's that you believe should not be there. This is unacceptable. You also state in said blog that you do not accept sustained flight. Let me tell you this, sustained flight has been shown on MULTIPLE occasions by Blake, Yang, and Ruby. Yang is one of the most obvious examples of this. If you do not agree with sustained flight, fine, there's nothing I can do about that, however, I haven't seen evidence of this yet, but, if I do find that you disagree with an OC using sustained flight, I will notify the people who ought to be notified. Just because you do not think something doesn't agree with RWBY, does not mean that it should not be there. Let me remind you that Ruby managing to move super fast, and Weiss being able to create glyphs, does not match with real life either. Thus, sustained flight can exist in RWBYverse.

If a person asks you personally to do a review on an OC, fine, they wish it to be so, and I wont stop them from doing so, but just going around and reviewing seemingly random OC's, will no longer be accepted. I have spoken to a few people, I will not list their names, as I do not have to, and they agree with me on point. Please refrain from doing as you have done in the future, and if you can prove to us that you have matured and are able to make fantastic OC's that no one can dispute fit exceptionally well into RWBYverse, then you maybe become candidate to become a reviewer. I do not know, it is pu to the admins on that point, and do not get your hopes up and use this against me because I wrote it. You cannot use this piece of writing against me in any manner, as that will display misconduct.

Thank you and have a good day.

Leaf 